Are we all better off or worse off that we now know about the increasingly mounting yet substance-lacking (although scathing) reports about the sexual harassment charges pending against GOP presidential contender Herman Cain? Not that I'm defending Cain on any grounds due to his waffling and conflicting answers in response to the allegations and his incredible statements about his version of the accounts of the story (which is still in progress), but why is this any more or less significant than the politically-charged sex scandals of the past? (Anyone remember then-President Bill Clinton's affair with Ginnifer Flowers and Paula Jones' infamous sexual harassment suit against him?)
Wednesday, November 2, 2011
Food For Thought
Posted by Todd Andrew Barnett at 10:53 AM 1 comments
Labels: GOP, Herman Cain, presidential candidate, sexual harassment
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)