Last week's nauseating, nonsensical, and pathetic GOP presidential debate hosted by CNN and the neoconservative think tank The Heritage Foundation in Washington, D.C. is both an epitome and a disturbing reminder of the lunacy of the Republican sideshow freaks (except for Ron Paul as usual) who have consistently demonstrated their naivete to the American public at large. These reprobates - from Mitt Romney to Herman Cain - will never learn and acknowledge that an offensive, aggressive, and warlike foreign policy will proceed to put American lives in jeopardy until they trace the history of this interventionism from Jefferson's attack on the Barbary Pirates (rather than to pay bribes to them) to the present day evils committed in the Middle East. (Take the United States government's present incursions here for instance.)
However, it goes without saying that the stentorian choruses of defending, protecting, worshiping, idolizing, and insulating the status quo are certainly over-the-top but not surprising. Ranging from preserving American foreign aid to Israel to "American exceptionalism" and "America leading the free world," they are nothing but contrivances to prop up pseudo images of the State's "benevolence," the self-deceit and vanities of the governmental players involved, and the State's self-appeasing, self-serving, and self-aggrandizing way of fashioning its own hubris under the guise of self-reassurance.
All of these things are said to shroud "national security" (which is government security) from the American people. The Democrats are just as horrendous on this issue, because they see it as a part of the government's need to engage in humanitarianism abroad with the backing of the U.N., unlike the GOP that prefers to have Americans and the Pentagon declaring war against a foreign regime for "defending national security first" and then "humanitarianism second." (Even Rick Santorum shares the Democratic trait on that thinking alone, despite his tough talk on terrorists and terrorism.)
Despite their minute differences on those issues, both major parties favor barbarism and welfare-warfare equality. With Republicans and Democrats like these (who are the heart of the tyrannical two-party system that expands, operates, and fuels the federal government), who needs enemies at all?
Showing posts with label GOP debate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label GOP debate. Show all posts
Saturday, December 3, 2011
The Republican Presidential Sideshow Freaks and Government Security
Posted by Todd Andrew Barnett at 2:46 AM 0 comments
Labels: American exceptionalism, CNN, Democrats, GOP debate, government security, Herman Cain, Newt Gingrich, Republicans, Rick Santorum, Ron Paul, the Heritage Foundation, the state, welfare-warfarism
Thursday, September 22, 2011
Ron Paul Wins The Fox News Debate Poll
According to Fox News' "Who Won The Debate?" poll, Ron Paul has won it, garnering 37.75% of the vote.
This is what the following poll shows:
Who Won the Debate?
By You Decide
Published September 22, 2011
Fox News and Google's Republican debate Thursday night in Orlando featured eight presidential candidates: Mitt Romney, Rick Perry, Newt Gingrich, Gary Johnson, Ron Paul, Rick Santorum, Jon Huntsman, Herman Cain and Michele Bachmann. Who won the debate?Share your thoughts, answer our question then click "Leave a Comment."
Thank you for voting!
Mitt Romney 23.37% (9,021 votes)
Rick Perry 12.73% (4,914 votes)
Newt Gingrich 7.23% (2,792 votes)
Ron Paul 37.75% (14,573 votes)
Rick Santorum 1.47% (566 votes)
Gary Johnson 2.05% (790 votes)
Herman Cain 11.67% (4,507 votes)
Michele Bachmann 2.11% (816 votes)
Jon Huntsman 1.62% (627 votes)
Total Votes: 38,605
At least this is a sigh of relief, given that tonight's debate was the most pathetic and most predictable one of all.
Posted by Todd Andrew Barnett at 9:35 PM 0 comments
Labels: Fox News, Gary Johnson, Google, GOP debate, Herman Cain, Michele Bachmann, Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, poll, Rick Perry, Rick Santorum, Ron Paul
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

